.
Kamalesh Sharma, Commonwealth Secretary
Segal told the Guardian that Sharma, an Indian diplomat, had concealed crucial legal advice showing Rajapakse's sacking of the country's chief justice in January was "illegal, unconstitutional and a violation of international law." A spokesman for Sharma defended his position, saying "the advice was sought in confidence and it was not necessary for him to discuss it in public," according to the Guardian report.
Asserting that if Sri Lanka was not hosting the summit it would have faced suspension from the 53-country group months ago, Segal also told Toronto's Globe and Mail, "I went to Sri Lanka as a fact finder for our foreign minister in April of this year. I saw wonderful new highways and buildings in Colombo that would rival those in Toronto. I also saw the bullet holes above the sofa in the office of the editor of a Tamil language newspaper in Jaffna."
While India, the regional power, unwilling to expose Sri Lanka's complicity in the crime of the century in killing more than 70,000 Tamil civilians in Mu'l'livaaykaal in 2009, in its characteristic fashion, is delaying announcing its stand on attending the Commonwealth meeting.
Analysts in Delhi said that while Singh's attendance would anger India's substantial Tamil population and thus be a political risk for the Congress party, which is facing elections in spring, a significant boycott was unlikely, the Guardian wrote.
"India is very uncomfortable with that sort of thing," said Shyam Saran, a former foreign secretary. "Though the relationship with Sri Lanka is not as cosy as it could be and there are strong domestic dimensions, there is a general recognition in government that both the relationship and the meeting, are nonetheless important," the paper said.
source:[TamilNet, Wednesday, 09 October 2013, 01:39 GMT]
No comments:
Post a Comment